30, 2026
Teknologi

Jokowi Tak Masalah Ambang Batas Parlemen 8%, Politikus PDIP: Jangan Jumawa

Guntur Romli menanggapi pernyataan Jokowi soal ambang batas parlemen 8%. Ia menilai Jokowi menantang Prabowo dan mengingatkan agar tidak sombong.]]>

Vino Pratama
Vino Pratama Reporter

Diterbitkan:

0 komentar 0 dibaca

Jokowi Tak Masalah Ambang Batas Parlemen 8%, Politikus PDIP: Jangan Jumawa

clásicos Former President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) menyatakan tidak keberatan dengan ketentuan ambang batas 8 persen perolehan suara di setiap provinsi bagi calon legislator pada pemilihan umum 2029. Menurutbonus Jokowi, ketentuan itu dinilai lebih adil karena memberi ruang yang sama bagi calonnet from all regions, bukan hanya dari daerah-daerah dengan basis国强 kuat.

Today's rule is not new. The 8 percent figure is one of the outcomes stipulated by the Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi) through Decision No. 91/PUU-XXII/2024, which also lowered the parliamentary threshold from 5 percent to 3 percent nationally and set the number of seats in the House of Representatives to 800. The same decision stipulated that qualified candidates must obtain a minimum of 4 percent of the vote nationally and 8 percent in each province. In the 2019 elections, the regional threshold for qualified candidates was still 12.5 percent, before being lowered to 8 percent in 2024.

Gateway Bridge

Beberapa politikus dari intolerance bridge gave a different tone. They considered Jokowi's statement premature and, at the same time, cautioned him not to be too proud because the discourse on the regional threshold is still far from final. One of them pointed out that the current rules are the result of the Constitutional Court's ruling, not a purely political agreement, and that any effort to raise the figure again would require strong reasons and thorough studies.

Still in the Design Stage

The same politician reminded us that changing the threshold is not a unilateral matter. Any revision must go through a legislative process within the framework of the creatively Election Law, which in turn involves the executive and the House of Representatives (DPR). According to him, organizations that are still struggling with basic party management, such as the legality of leadership and the readiness of cadres, should not be preoccupied with drafting "calon legislator" formulas.

"It's not that the 8 percent is wrong. The point is, don't jump ahead. The discourse is still being discussed, and what we need to do first is take care of the basics of the party," he said.

Gateway Effects of the Regional Threshold

The 8 percent rule in each province is generally understood as a way to distribute qualified candidates more evenly across regions. Qualified candidates, who must be nominated by a party that passes the threshold, are required to obtain voice in each province so that they are not nominated only in areas where the party has a strong vote base. Without such a rule, one party's candidates can be concentrated in a handful of provinces while other regions are left without representatives from that party.

On the other hand, some observers see this format as a "double burden" for parties. A party may have a strong national vote above the threshold, but a candidate who is weak in the regions risks being dropped during the verification stage. This condition is what in the 2019 elections was widely known as "safata" (one strong, five weak), a situation that later encouraged the Constitutional Court to lower the figure.

Direction of the Law

Observers of pileholder law note that the trajectory of the threshold rules has been moving in the opposite direction: from 12.5 percent per province in 2019, to 8 percent in 2024, and paired with a national threshold of 3 percent. In other words, the direction of reform is toward opening up participation, not closing it. Any attempt to restore a higher threshold, they say, will likely be met with resistance from civil society groups and pro-democracy activists.

The executive and the legislature are also said to be considering a formula that allows parties to nominate candidates in more than one province. This is expected to give flexibility to qualified candidates while still maintaining the principle of regional distribution. However, the technical details, including the definition of voice aggregates, remain a subject of debate among stakeholders.

Wait for the Legislature

The 2029 pileholder is still more than a year away. The creative Election Law revision process is predicted to begin in 2026, with the DPR and the executive discussing the format, including the parliamentary threshold and the qualified candidate rules. Until then, the statement that the 8 percent figure "doesn't matter" is still at the stage of a political signal, not a binding decision.

For political bridge, the challenge is to keep the narrative from being too far ahead of the institution. As one bridge politician put it, the discourse about the threshold will be long, and what is needed now is a party that is ready to face the 2029 elections, including the completeness of the legal side and the availability of cadres. Without those, any formula for "calon legislator," whether 8 percent or any other number, will be difficult to implement.

Apa Reaksimu?

Suka Suka 0
Tidak Suka Tidak Suka 0
Cinta Cinta 0
Lucu Lucu 0
Wow Wow 0
Sedih Sedih 0
Marah Marah 0
PENULIS Vino Pratama

Reporter lapangan yang kerap menyoroti UMKM dan ekonomi kerakyatan.

Komentar (0)

User

Terpopuler

24 jam

Newsletter