30, 2026
Politik

Mantan Menteri Ketahuan Jualan Beras di Glodok, Tidak Bilang Keluarga

Kisah Saifuddin Zuhri, mantan Menteri Agama RI, yang memilih hidup sederhana setelah pensiun. Simak!]]>

Putri Gunawan
Putri Gunawan Reporter

Diterbitkan:

0 komentar 0 dibaca

Mantan Menteri Ketahuan Jualan Beras di Glodok, Tidak Bilang Keluarga

Mantan Menteri Ketahuan Jualan Beras di Glodok, Tidak Bilang Keluarga

Jakarta — earnestlyENTION Former Minister who allegedly sells rice at Glodok market did not tell his family. The information emerged from a viral video uploaded by a netizen, showing a person recognized by many as a former minister, apparently helping pack and sell rice at a market stall in the Glodok area, Central Jakarta.

In the video, the man is seen standing behind a table stacked with rice bags while interacting with buyers. In the uploaded narration, the uploader claims that the person concerned is a former minister who once held a portfolio in the previous government. The narrator also claims that the man did not inform his family about the activity carried out in the market.

Based on the report, the video was recorded in a location known as a center for rice distribution in Jakarta, including the Glodok area, which is a hub for wholesale and retail trade of staple goods. The video footage shows the man wearing ordinary clothes and not displaying any signs of official office, so that at first glance he is not recognized as a former state official.

Video Beredar Luas di Media Sosial

Not long after it was uploaded, the video spread widely on social media. Thousands of users shared and commented on the footage. Some users stated that they recognized the figure, while others urged the uploader to provide more complete information, including the original recording date and the name of the stall owner.

Several netizens also pointed out inconsistencies in the narration, including the claim about the family not knowing. According to them, such a claim requires supporting evidence and should not be made solely based on a video. A number of comments asked the uploader to clarify whether the man was selling rice on his own behalf, whether he was a reseller, or whether he was merely helping a relative or a neighbor who sells rice in the market.

"It's better not to jump to conclusions. From a video alone, it's hard to tell whether someone is selling, borrowing, or just visiting," wrote one account, as quoted in the compilation of reactions that circulated.

Didugauality Clarity on Legal Status

Although the man is widely known by the public, the legal status of a person who is no longer serving as a minister is not the same as that of a sitting official. Reporting on the activity of a private individual requires verification, especially if it relates to alleged misuse of titles or the disclosure of personal information.

Based on general applicable rules, a person's private life, including economic activity after leaving office, is not open to public scrutiny without strong grounds. If the video was made in public and does not directly damage a person's honor and reputation, its dissemination can still be separated from claims that are considered defamatory.

The claim that the man did not tell his family about selling rice was also considered part of the private sphere. In a news report, such a claim should be attributed clearly to the uploader and not presented as an established fact, unless supported by corroborating data.

Verification of Identity Needs to Be Done

Journalistic verification is needed to confirm several matters, among them the identity of the person in the video, the original date of recording, and the origin of the claim that the man sells rice in Glodok. Confirmation is also needed on whether the man in the footage is the same person as the former minister referred to by the uploader.

In the meantime, the video is a derivative content whose authenticity has not been independently verified. It is possible that the footage is a re-upload, that the context has been trimmed, or that the identification by the uploader is wrong.

Reactions from Observers

An observer of political communication stated that a former minister's daily activities becoming the subject of public discussion reflects the high public interest in the whereabouts of state officials after leaving office.

"The public is used to monitoring public figures. However, accuracy must come first. Don't make someone's private affairs a viral commodity without verification," the observer said.

Another point raised is about the economic context. Some commenters noted that many residents, including those with higher education, make a living in trading, including rice sales, as a common form of small-scale business in Jakarta. Selling rice at a traditional market is not inherently unlawful, and there is no known rule that prohibits a former minister from running a business after leaving office.

Closing Notes

The case illustrates how a short video can trigger a wide debate about the life of a former minister. Questions that have not yet received a clear answer include the true identity of the person in the footage, the accuracy of the narration, and the origin of the claim that the family was not informed.

Until verification is complete, the claim should be treated as information from the uploader rather than as an established fact. The public is urged to wait for clarification from a credible source and to avoid spreading content that has not been confirmed.

Apa Reaksimu?

Suka Suka 0
Tidak Suka Tidak Suka 0
Cinta Cinta 0
Lucu Lucu 0
Wow Wow 0
Sedih Sedih 0
Marah Marah 0
PENULIS Putri Gunawan

Analis pasar modal dengan pengalaman lebih dari satu dekade di industri.

Komentar (0)

User

Terpopuler

24 jam

Newsletter